A provision criterion or practice (PCP) is a legal term used in discrimination law.
In particular, PCP is used in indirect discrimination claims. In order to prove indirect discrimination, firstly, an employee must prove that a provision criterion or practice has been applied to them. See Section 19(1) of the Equality Act 2010.
Defining a provision criterion or practice (PCP)
The Equality Act does not define “provision criterion or practice”. This means it can have a very broad meaning. In reality, the the employee simply has to establish that something at work, whether it’s a rule, a practice, a requirement or a condition, puts them at a disadvantage.
A classic example
A classic example of a PCP is an employer’s requirement that a position be worked on a full time basis.
This requirement is potentially disadvantageous to women. The reason being that statistically, more women than men need to work part-time (because of childcare commitments).
As such, if a role which has previously been done by a woman on a part-time basis is made into a full-time role, which the woman cannot do because of childcare commitments, then she has been forced out of her job by the application of a PCP.
PCPs can be set out in employment contracts, handbooks, letters, memos to staff and notices. In fact they can be contained in any type of rule or regulation set out by the employer.
Furthermore, they don’t have to be in writing or explicitly stated in any way. For example a certain custom and practice adopted by an employer, can be treated as a PCP.
Once the PCP has been identified by the employee, they must then go on to prove that, when the PCP was applied to him or her, it is also applied to people who don’t share the protected characteristic in question.
Using the example above, the woman whose job has been made full time must provide proof of this. Namely, that the full time requirement applies to people who don’t share a protected characteristic, i.e. men.
If no comparator can be identified (for example a man doing the same job) the employee can rely on a hypothetical comparator.
A provision criterion or practice, is a rule which, when applied to all, puts certain individuals at a disadvantage. If the individual can prove this, they may be able to make a claim for indirect discrimination.
Tom Street qualified in 2003 and had over 16 years experience in all areas of litigious law. He studied at the University of Manchester. He undertook his legal practice course at the College of Law in Guildford. He then, subsequently underwent his legal training specialising in employment law and litigation, at a firm in Chancery Lane, London.
Fully qualified, he moved to a niche litigation practice in the City of London.
In 2005, Tom set up his own legal practice, Tom Street & Co Solicitors and as part of this, in accordance with his strongly held objective to provide everyone with an easy pathway and readily available access to justice he established the online portals Do I Have A Case? and Tribunal Claim. These websites are trading names of Tom Street & Co Solicitors.